The Anti-Biofilm Activity and Mechanism of Apigenin-7-O-Glucoside Against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to examine the anti-biofilm activity and mechanism of gallic acid (GA), kaempferol-7-O-glucoside (K7G) and apigenin-7-O-glucoside (A7G) against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Methods: The antibacterial activity of the natural compounds was determined by serial dilution method. The inhibitory activity of natural compounds on biofilms was determined by crystal violet staining method. The effects and mechanisms of natural compounds on bacterial biofilms were analyzed by atomic force microscopy. Results: In our study, compared with GA and K7G, A7G was found to exhibit the strongest anti-biofilm and antibacterial activities. The minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) of A7G against S. aureus and E. coli was 0.20 mg/mL and 0.10 mg/mL, respectively. The inhibition rates of 1/2 MIC of A7G on biofilms of S. aureus and E. coli were 88.9%, and 83.2% respectively. Moreover, atomic force microscope (AFM) images showed the three-dimensional biofilm morphology of S. aureus and E. coli, and the results indicated that A7G was highly effective in biofilm inhibition. Discussion: It was found that the inhibition of A7G on biofilm was achieved through inhibiting on exopolysaccharides (EPS), quorum sensing (QS), and cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH). A7G exerted strong anti-biofilm activities by inhibiting EPS production, QS, and CSH. Hence, A7G, as a natural substance, could be a promising novel antibacterial and anti-biofilm agent for control of biofilm in food industry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pei, Z. J., Li, C., Dai, W., Lou, Z., Sun, X., Wang, H., … Wan, C. (2023). The Anti-Biofilm Activity and Mechanism of Apigenin-7-O-Glucoside Against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Infection and Drug Resistance, 16, 2129–2140. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S387157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free