Management of splenic trauma: The Durban experience

13Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a retrospective survey of splenic trauma managed at a teaching hospital, the data of 127 patients during a 2 year period have been analysed. Splenic conservation was achieved in 47 laparotomies (38·8 per cent). Six patients with blunt abdominal trauma (4·7 per cent of all patients) were managed non‐operatively. Splenic conservation by suture with or without packing with omentum or oxidized cellulose was successful in 27 out of 37 attempts. Failure of this technique was easily recognized during laparotomy and no patient required re‐operation for continued splenic bleeding after splenorrhaphy. There was no significant difference between successful conservation of the spleen at laparotomy of patients below the median age (28 years) and older patients. Wound sepsis was increased after splenectomy (P < 0·05). Splenic conservation is not appropriate for all types of splenic injury. Where conservation is not possible splenectomy and re‐implantation is recommended. Copyright © 1985 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chadwick, S. J. D., Huizinga, W. K. J., & Baker, L. W. (1985). Management of splenic trauma: The Durban experience. British Journal of Surgery, 72(8), 634–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800720817

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free