Can shoulder dystocia be predicted before operative vaginal delivery using a score that includes ultrasonographic head–perineum distance measurement?

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The main study objective was to develop a novel shoulder dystocia (SD) prediction score using ultrasound-based head–perineum distance measured before an operative vaginal delivery (OVD). Methods: This retrospective unicentric study (Lille, France) included all cases of OVD of singleton pregnancies from March 2019 to October 2020, with cephalic presentation and > 37 weeks of gestation, for which intrapartum sonography was performed. A multiclass-penalized logistic regression model was used to develop the SD prognostic score, with missing values imputed by multiple imputations. Results: Among the 1708 patients with OVD, 773 who underwent ultrasound for head–perineum distance were included. SD occurred in 99 cases (12.8%). The SD's predicting factors (and their weights) included the following: maternal age younger than 28 years (3 points); multiparous (4 points); induced labor (4 points); gestational diabetes (3 points); and head–perineum distance without pressure (≤20 mm [−2 points], using 21–30 mm as reference, 31–40 mm [2 points], 41–50 mm [4 points], 51–60 mm [6 points], and >60 mm [8 points]). Three patient risk subgroups were categorized as score range (occurrence percentage) as low risk: < 3 (< 10%), high risk: 3–8 (10%–20%), and very high risk: > 8 (> 20%). Conclusion: The developed scoring system may help predict SD occurrence during OVD using five delivery room parameters. Replication with other populations and prospective cohorts will be needed for validation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Renon, P., Drumez, E., Sanchez, M., Labreuche, J., & Garabedian, C. (2025). Can shoulder dystocia be predicted before operative vaginal delivery using a score that includes ultrasonographic head–perineum distance measurement? International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 171(1), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70184

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free