Chromogranin A as serum marker for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A single center experience and literature review

34Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical sensitivities of the tumor markers chromogranin A (CgA), urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the GastroEnteroPancreatic-(GEP-) system depending on tumor primary location and metastatic spread. In a retrospective single-center series, sensitivities were evaluated in serum samples from 110 patients with midgut (n = 62) and pancreatic (n = 48) NETs. CgA levels were analyzed by a commercially-available immunoradiometric assay (CIS-bio) during routine follow-up in the years 2000-2009. CgA showed a higher sensitivity for midgut (68%) than pancreatic (54%) NETs. A higher CgA sensitivity and significantly higher median CgA values were found in patients with liver metastases than in those without, and in patients with hepatic and additionally extra-hepatic metastases than in those with hepatic and nodal metastases alone, respectively. We found an overall sensitivity for elevated 5HIAA excretion of 69% for midgut NETs and a significant correlation between median CgA and 5-HIAA values. The sensitivity of AP and the correlations of AP/CgA-data-pairs were low in both midgut and pancreatic NETs, although highest for metastatic pancreatic NETs. The sensitivity of CgA measurement depends on the NET primary location and spread of disease. 5-HIAA and CgA showed comparable sensitivity in midgut NETs, while AP does not seem to be useful as a tumor marker in GEP-NETs. © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nölting, S., Kuttner, A., Lauseker, M., Vogeser, M., Haug, A., Herrmann, K. A., … Auernhammer, C. J. (2012). Chromogranin A as serum marker for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A single center experience and literature review. Cancers, 4(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers4010141

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free