European foreign investment policy towards China: Is there an EU net contribution?

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The paper discusses the regulatory influence of the EU on the global investment regime, by focusing on how its regulatory power is represented in its investment treaty negotiations. It assesses the contribution of EU integration in this area by analysing whether its regulatory power over China is greater than that of each of its Member States cumulatively in investment agreement negotiations. Using text-as-data methodology, it concludes that the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment enters into a symbiotic relationship with the pre-existing BIT framework, falling short on substantive provisions while overall advancing the EU's position in soft areas such as market access, SOE regulation or transparency. Additional variables which are accounted for are the possible strengths and limitations of the EU's regulatory power, normative differences, the temporal gap, or China's own domestic and foreign trade policy. In the context of strategic autonomy, the CAI illustrates the shortcomings and advantages of EU regulatory power. Its findings are significant to understand the regulatory influence that the EU has on the governance of the investment regime, and the evolution of its regulatory capacity on investment in international relations, especially vis-à-vis major players.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Comerma, L. (2025). European foreign investment policy towards China: Is there an EU net contribution? Asia Pacific Law Review, 33(1), 102–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2024.2428158

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free