Acceso vascular periferico en neonatos de cuidado intensivo: Experiencia de un hospital publico

11Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the context of a public hospital, a prospective study was conducted to compare two methods of peripheral venous catheterization used in neonatal intensive care units. Type and incidence of complications and venipunction practices were analyzed. 828 catheters were used in 75 neonates (595 Vialon® and 233 Butterfly steel needle). The mean life span of Vialon® was longer than Butterfly. In neonates less than 1500g, Insyte® remained functional longer than Butterfly, but this required less time and attempts to be installed. The main reason to removal both types of catheters were extravasations (75%). There were no differences in phlebitis incidence but tissue necrosis incidence was higher in Butterfly (RR: 17,8; IC95 2,2 _ 144,5). We recommend the use of Vialon®, even though the utilization time is longer than 72 hours. © 2007 Universidad de Concepción.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barria P., R. M., & Santander M., G. (2006). Acceso vascular periferico en neonatos de cuidado intensivo: Experiencia de un hospital publico. Ciencia y Enfermeria, 12(2), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95532006000200005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free