Re: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus electrical stimulation with pelvic floor muscle training for overactive bladder syndrome in women: results of a randomized controlled study

1Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To the editor, I thank the authors of “Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus electrical stimulation with pelvic floor muscle training for overactive bladder syndrome in women: results of a randomized controlled study (1).” I support the importance you attribute to intravaginal electrical stimulation (IVES) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the management of idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB). The authors stated that PTNS is more effective than IVES in women with idiopathic OAB. Women with antimuscarinic naive OAB were included in this study (1). However, it is known that many patients with idiopathic OAB receive pharmacological treatment before reaching a conservative treatment option such as IVES. As the authors stated, in common practice, antimuscarinic agents are frequently used as an initial treatment although burdened by a low adherence, and these patients need protracted treatment with periodic controls

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yildiz, N. (2022). Re: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus electrical stimulation with pelvic floor muscle training for overactive bladder syndrome in women: results of a randomized controlled study. International Braz J Urol. Brazilian Society of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0168

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free