Clinical evaluation of three urine screening tests

25Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Evaluations of screening tests for bacteriuria have traditionally compared the test results with those of quantitative urine cultures. However, many patients with symptomatic urinary tract infections can have <105 CFU/ml in their urine. Therefore, the results of urine culture and three screening tests (Bac-T-Screen, Chemstrip LN [which tests for leukocyte esterase and nitrate reductase], and Gram stain) were correlated with the clinical classification of urinary tract infection. The Bac-T-Screen test detected 98, 93, and 100% of the infections classified as probable, possible, and asymptomatic, respectively. In contrast, the Gram stain, leukocyte esterase, and nitrate reductase tests were all insensitive screening tests for infection. Additionally, only 45% of the patients with probable infection had ≥105 CFU/ml. Thus, the majority of infected patients would not have been detected if quantitative urine cultures were used alone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murray, P. R., Smith, T. B., & McKinney, T. C. (1987). Clinical evaluation of three urine screening tests. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 25(3), 467–470. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.25.3.467-470.1987

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free