Abstract
Evaluations of screening tests for bacteriuria have traditionally compared the test results with those of quantitative urine cultures. However, many patients with symptomatic urinary tract infections can have <105 CFU/ml in their urine. Therefore, the results of urine culture and three screening tests (Bac-T-Screen, Chemstrip LN [which tests for leukocyte esterase and nitrate reductase], and Gram stain) were correlated with the clinical classification of urinary tract infection. The Bac-T-Screen test detected 98, 93, and 100% of the infections classified as probable, possible, and asymptomatic, respectively. In contrast, the Gram stain, leukocyte esterase, and nitrate reductase tests were all insensitive screening tests for infection. Additionally, only 45% of the patients with probable infection had ≥105 CFU/ml. Thus, the majority of infected patients would not have been detected if quantitative urine cultures were used alone.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Murray, P. R., Smith, T. B., & McKinney, T. C. (1987). Clinical evaluation of three urine screening tests. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 25(3), 467–470. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.25.3.467-470.1987
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.