The Natural History of Retinal Sensitivity Loss in Diabetic Macular Ischemia over One Year Evaluated by Microperimetry

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This one-year prospective observational study, conducted at two centers, aimed to report the natural history of retinal sensitivity (RS) loss in diabetic macular ischemia (DMI). Methods: Patients with stable-treated proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were recruited if there was evidence of DMI on optical coherence tomography angiography, defined as a foveal avascular zone ≥ 0.5 mm2 or parafoveal capillary dropout ≥ 1 quadrant. The minimal visual acuity required for performing microperimetry (MP) was ≥54 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (Snellen equivalent 20/80). The overall RS (oRS) and pointwise sensitivity (PWS) within the 3 × 3 mm macula were assessed at baseline and twelve months. A value <25 decibels (dB) was defined as impaired RS, and a decrease of 2 and 7 dB was regarded as mild and severe loss, respectively. Results: A total of 88 patients (97 eyes) were included. No statistically significant MP changes were detected at one year. However, 10% of the cohort lost oRS ≥ 2 dB, and 73% lost ≥2 dB PWS in ≥5 loci, whereas 1% lost oRS ≥ 7 dB, and 4% lost ≥7 dB PWS in ≥5 loci. The foveola and temporal parafovea were the most vulnerable to severe RS loss. Compared to their counterpart, eyes with baseline oRS ≥ 25 dB had significantly more RS loss in the macula and superior parafovea (55% versus 32% and 53% versus 28%, both p = 0.01). Conclusions: Rather than oRS loss, ≥2 dB loss in PWS in ≥5 loci is a more feasible outcome measure for clinical trials in DMI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsai, W. S., Thottarath, S., Gurudas, S., Zhao, J., Cheung, C. M. G., Yamaguchi, T. C. N., … Sivaprasad, S. (2024). The Natural History of Retinal Sensitivity Loss in Diabetic Macular Ischemia over One Year Evaluated by Microperimetry. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082219

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free