Diferenciación social y normativa en modelos de análisis de políticas públicas

Abstract

Just as public policy assumptions are recognizable shape them to, such as, among others, understanding of the processes of social differentiation and regulation in modern societies, the same is true of the analysis models policies. The assumptions underlying the paper is that in the classical models of public policy analysis (rational model, the institutional model, incremental model, public choice model, model groups and elites), policymakers are dominated by two figures: the 'Actor omniscient 'and the' moral guardian 'of society (Jobert, 2004). The first, reflecting a hierarchical or monocentric society. The second, reflecting a kind of conventional norms. Both figures would be theoretically linked through homology between forms of social differentiation (Luhmann) and forms of differentiation rules (Habermas). The first, linked to a form of social differentiation estates and the second, to a stage of conventional norms. From the analysis of the models referred and proposed joint model between social differentiation and regulation, raises the challenge of devising policies and models of public policy analysis in their understanding of the processes of social differentiation and regulatory simultaneously reflect the increasingly polycentric heterarchical or modern societies and the growing demand for postconventional type regulations, according to regulatory diversity increased in the multiple actors in the policy process.