Long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ

7Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is controversial. Using population-cohort data, we examined whether SLNB improves long-term outcomes among patients with DCIS who underwent breast-conserving surgery. We identified 12 776 women aged 67-94 years diagnosed during 2001-2013 with DCIS who underwent breast-conserving surgery from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare dataset, 1992 (15.6%) of whom underwent SLNB (median follow-up: 69months). Tests of statistical significance are two-sided. Patients with and without SLNB did not differ statistically significantly regarding treated recurrence (3.9% vs 3.7%; P = .62), ipsilateral invasive occurrence (1.4% vs 1.7%, P = .33), or breast cancer mortality (1.0% vs 0.9%, P = .86). With Mahalanobis-matching and competing-risks survival analyses, SLNB was not statistically significantly associated with treated recurrence, ipsilateral invasive occurrence, or breast cancer mortality (P > .27). Our findings do not support the routine performance of SLNB for older patients with DCIS amenable to breast conservation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hung, P., Wang, S. Y., Killelea, B. K., Mougalian, S. S., Evans, S. B., Sedghi, T., & Gross, C. P. (2019). Long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ. JNCI Cancer Spectrum, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkz052

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free