Complications of Sural Nerve Biopsy in Diabetic versus Non-Diabetic Patients

41Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We compare complications from 66 sural nerve biopsies in 41 patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy to 40 patients with neuropathy from other causes, using a retrospective telephone survey. Diabetic patients were followed for a mean of 6.8 years and non-diabetics for 5.6 years. Mild long-term pain was described by 18.9% of patients overall with no difference between groups. Mild persistent sensory symptoms, insufficient to interfere with daily activity or warrant medical therapy, were reported by 63.6% of diabetic and 27.5% of non-diabetic patients (p < 0.006). Wound infection and severe pain were uncommon in both groups and no different in diabetics. Significant complications of sural nerve biopsy occurred no more frequently in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients. While sural nerve biopsy plays no role in the routine evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, it may be performed without increased risk when indicated in these patients to exclude other causes of neuropathy and in the context of research trials. © 1994, Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perry, J. R., & Bril, V. (1994). Complications of Sural Nerve Biopsy in Diabetic versus Non-Diabetic Patients. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien Des Sciences Neurologiques, 21(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0317167100048733

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free