Indigenous Language Teaching Policy in California/the U.S.: What’s Left Unsaid in Discourse/Funding

  • Moline E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of indigenous language revitalization in California and the United States as it relates to language policy in schools. How do language policies—specifically, No Child Left Behind, the Native American Languages Act, and those of local funding—affect revitalization efforts? Based on a grounded exploration of language policies regarding Native American communities in the State of California, this paper offers: 1) a close analysis of how policies relegate Native community language needs to the background, and 2) how the realities of funding affect the implicit and explicit statements of these policies. In particular, a critical discourse analysis of policy documents is put forth. This analysis reveals that language revitalization efforts involve more than communities working to teach dying languages; they involve us addressing several background issues concerning existing language policies as well as efforts on the part of funders to raise awareness of Native American language concerns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moline, E. A. (2020). Indigenous Language Teaching Policy in California/the U.S.: What’s Left Unsaid in Discourse/Funding. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/l4211037129

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free