Differing member state approaches to the development of the EU Battlegroup Concept: implications for CSDP

23Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article will analyse the challenges facing the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) through an evaluation of the impact that differing member state strategic cultures have on the EU Battlegroup Concept, highlighted through the examples of Germany and Poland. The concept was initiated to give the EU an increased rapid reaction capacity. However, as emphasised through the cases of Germany and Poland, divergences in EU member states' strategic cultures remain, including when, where and how force is used. When this is combined with the cost of plugging military capabilities' gaps, the political willingness to deploy a Battlegroup can be affected. Whilst the article highlights that the role that member states want to play within CSDP as well as international expectations can override constraining factors, the Battlegroups rely on a rotation system. As some member states are more willing to deploy the Battlegroups than others, the concept risks becoming a declaratory policy thus undermining CSDP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chappell, L. (2009). Differing member state approaches to the development of the EU Battlegroup Concept: implications for CSDP. European Security, 18(4), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2010.498419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free