Posterior cruciate ligament: Focus on conflicting issues

40Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is little consensus on how to optimally reconstruct the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and the natural history of injured PCL is also unclear. The graft material (autograft vs. allograft), the type of tibial fixation (tibial inlay vs. transtibial tunnel), the femoral tunnel position within the femoral footprint (isometric, central, or eccentric), and the number of bundles in the reconstruction (1 bundle vs. 2 bundles) are among the many decisions that a surgeon must make in a PCL reconstruction. In addition, there is a paucity of information on rehabilitation after reconstruction of the PCL and posterolateral structures. This article focused on the conflicting issues regarding the PCL, and the scientific rationales behind some critical points are discussed. © 2013 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, Y. S., & Jung, Y. B. (2013). Posterior cruciate ligament: Focus on conflicting issues. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2013.5.4.256

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free