Blood Glucose Monitoring Data Should Be Reported in Detail When Studies About Efficacy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Are Published

16Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recently, two clinical trials about a “sensor-based flash glucose monitoring system” and its efficacy in reducing time in hypoglycemia were published. Interestingly, patients spent more time at low glucose concentrations in these studies than in other studies related to the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM). Although it is possible that the study populations differed from those in other studies, another potential explanation is that the CGM system used in these two studies had a negative glucose measurement bias. Such a negative bias was reported in recent literature, suggesting that the CGM system may inaccurately indicate hypoglycemia. Reporting blood glucose monitoring data would help to interpret the CGM data at least in the context of time spent in various glucose ranges as a parameter with which quality of diabetes therapy is measured.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pleus, S., Heinemann, L., & Freckmann, G. (2018). Blood Glucose Monitoring Data Should Be Reported in Detail When Studies About Efficacy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Are Published. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 12(5), 1061–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296817753629

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free