A randomized clinical trial comparing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir versus maraviroc each with tenofovir plus emtricitabine for post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection

12Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) non-completion at day 28, comparing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir versus maraviroc, both with tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine as the backbone. Methods: We conducted a prospective, open, randomized clinical trial. Individuals attending the emergency room because of potential sexual exposure to HIV and who met criteria for receiving PEP were randomized to one of two groups: tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine (245/200 mg) once daily plus either ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (400/100 mg) or maraviroc (300 mg) twice daily. Five follow-up visits were scheduled for days 1, 10, 28, 90 and 180. The primary endpoint was PEP non-completion at day 28. Secondary endpoints were adherence, adverse events and rate of seroconversions. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01533272. Results: One-hundred-and-seventeen individuals were randomized to receive ritonavir-boosted lopinavir and 120 to maraviroc (n=237). PEP non-completion at day 28 was 38% (n=89), with significant differences between arms [ritonavir-boosted lopinavir 44% (n=51) versus maraviroc 32% (n=38), P=0.05]. We performed a modified ITT analysis including only those patients who attended on day 1 (n=182). PEP noncompletion in this subgroup was also significantly higher in the ritonavir-boosted lopinavir arm (27% versus 13%, P=0.004). The proportion of patients with low adherence was similar between arms (52% versus 47%, P=0.56). Adverse events were reported by 111 patients and were significantly more common in the ritonavir- boosted lopinavir arm (72% versus 51%, P=0.003). No seroconversions were observed during the study. Conclusions: PEP non-completion and adverse eventswere both significantly higher in patients allocated to ritonavir- boosted lopinavir. These data suggest that maraviroc is a well-tolerated antiretroviral that can be used in this setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leal, L., León, A., Torres, B., Inciarte, A., Lucero, C., Mallolas, J., … Espinosa, G. (2016). A randomized clinical trial comparing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir versus maraviroc each with tenofovir plus emtricitabine for post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 71(7), 1982–1986. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free