Down-regulation of GATA1 uncouples STAT5-induced erythroid differentiation from stem/progenitor cell proliferation

22Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Previously,we have shown that overexpression of an activated mutant of signal transducer and activator of transcription-5 (STAT5) induces erythropoiesis, impaired myelopoiesis, and an increase in long-term proliferation of human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Because GATA1 is a key transcription factor involved in erythropoiesis, the involvement of GATA1 in STAT5-induced phenotypes was studied by shRNA-mediated knockdown of GATA1. CD34+ cord blood cells were double transduced with a conditionally active STAT5 mutant and a lentiviral vector expressing a short hairpin against GATA1. Erythropoiesis was completely abolished in the absence of GATA1, indicating that STAT5-induced erythropoiesis is GATA1-dependent. Furthermore, the impaired myelopoiesis in STAT5-transduced cells was restored by GATA1 knockdown. Interestingly, early cobblestone formation was only modestly affected, and long-term growth of STAT5-positive cells was increased in the absence of GATA1, whereby high progenitor numbers were maintained. Thus, GATA1 down-regulation allowed the dissection of STAT5-induced differentiation phenotypes from the effects on long-term expansion of stem/progenitor cells. Gene expression profiling allowed the identification of GATA1-dependent and GATA1-independent STAT5 target genes, and these studies revealed that several proliferation-related genes were up-regulated by STAT5 independent of GATA1, whereas several erythroid differentiation-related genes were found to be GATA1 as well as STAT5 dependent. © 2010 by The American Society of Hematology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wierenga, A. T. J., Vellenga, E., & Schuringa, J. J. (2010). Down-regulation of GATA1 uncouples STAT5-induced erythroid differentiation from stem/progenitor cell proliferation. Blood, 115(22), 4367–4376. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-10-250894

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free