A comparison between propofol and thiopentone as induction agents in obstetric anaesthesia

59Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two comparable series of 21 patients who had elective Caesarean section had general anaesthesia induced by thiopentone sodium 4.53 (SD 0.65) mg/kg or propofol 2.15 (SD 0.26) mg/kg. Maintenance was similar for both groups. Blood pressure was lower in the propofol group during the induction‐delivery interval. Umbilicallmaternal vein ratios for thiopentone and propofol were 8.5 and 7.2 respectively. Infant wellbeing as judged by Apgar score and cord blood analysis showed little difference between the two induction agents. Factors associated with uterine relaxation and bleeding were similar in the two groups. Copyright © 1989, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

MOORE, J., BILL, K. M., FLYNN, R. J., McKEATING, K. T., & HOWARD, P. J. (1989). A comparison between propofol and thiopentone as induction agents in obstetric anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 44(9), 753–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1989.tb09263.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free