Why is economics not part of a system of scientific ethics? A review essay on Wilfred Dolfsma and Ioana Negru's The Ethical Formation of Economists

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Until the 1990s, the most used research and teaching materials for economists were print journal articles and print books. Since the Internet was commercialized in the 1990s, economists have used digital technologies in research and teaching. Journal articles and books are now more easily accessed. Online subscription systems allow economists to acquire electronic study and research materials in real time. Researchers can access a wealth of teaching and research materials freely and openly. In this essay [1], I focus on Wilfred Dolfsma and Ioana Negru's The Ethical Formation of Economists (Dolfsma and Negru 2019) and claim that digital economics research requires a global understanding of ethics consistent with the values of scholarly practices. In the absence of scientific ethics, digital tools and software can harm the members of scholarly communities internationally and become a source of scientific misconduct. Economics should be taught as part of a system of scientific ethics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yalcintas, A. (2020). Why is economics not part of a system of scientific ethics? A review essay on Wilfred Dolfsma and Ioana Negru’s The Ethical Formation of Economists. Journal of Philosophical Economics: Reflections on Economic and Social Issues, 13(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.46298/JPE.10742

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free