The art of reviewing journal articles and its advantages for reviewers

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Peer-review is one of the pillars of academic publishing and helps editors in selecting the best works. Reviewers serve as a jury that evaluates submitted manuscripts and helps fellow researchers to improve their work. Unfortunately, detailed instructions or dedicated courses for the best practices in manuscript reviewing are scarce. Then how should one go about reviewing a manuscript? More importantly, why should one serve as a reviewer? The aim of this essay is to answer both these questions by providing a step-by-step procedure for manuscript review and a list of advantages of being a reviewer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saini, G. (2018). The art of reviewing journal articles and its advantages for reviewers. European Science Editing, 44(1), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.20316/ESE.2018.44.17011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free