Personal cytometers: Slow flow or no flow?

54Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Although some manufacturers have optimistically described instruments with prices in the US$40,000 range as "personal cytometers", analogy with the personal computer suggests that the target price for a true "personal" cytometer should be under $5,000. Since such an apparatus could find a wide range of applications in cytomics in both developing and developed countries, it seemed desirable to consider its technical and economic feasibility. Methods: Using resolution targets and a variety of fluorescent bead standards immobilized on filters and/or slides, we evaluated high-intensity LEDs as fluorescence excitation sources, relatively inexpensive CCD cameras as detectors, and 35 mm camera lenses and plastic low-power microscope optics for light collection in a simple, inexpensive low-resolution imaging cytometer. Results: The components tested could be combined to produce an instrument capable of detecting fewer than 10,000 molecules of cell-associated fluorescent label, and thus applicable to a broad range of cytometric tasks. Conclusions: Given the requirements for light sources, detectors, optics, mechanics, electronics and data analysis hardware and software, and the components presently available, it should be easier to reach the desired $5,000 price point with an image cytometer than with a flow cytometer. © 2006 International Society for Analytical Cytology.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shapiro, H. M., & Perlmutter, N. G. (2006). Personal cytometers: Slow flow or no flow? Cytometry Part A, 69(7), 620–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20284

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free