Intelligence Sharing and the Fight against Terrorism in the Eu: Lessons Learned from Europol

  • Bureš O
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Ex-post investigations of major terrorist attacks in Europe have highlighted the contradiction between the seemingly free movement of terrorists across Europe and the lack of EU-wide intelligence sharing. In response, EU policymakers have repeatedly promised to improve intelligence sharing across Europe, and some have even floated the idea that Europol should be turned into a centralised EU criminal intelligence hub, akin to the US Federal Bureau of Investigation. In this article, I argue that despite the clear need for borderless intelligence sharing as a response to borderless terrorism, Europol is highly unlikely to become a genuine intelligence agency in the foreseeable future. Experience to date with Europol suggests that it is one thing for Europe's policymakers to make public promises to improve the fight against terrorism via better intelligence sharing across Europe, and quite another thing for them to persuade the relevant national agencies to comply.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bureš, O. (2016). Intelligence Sharing and the Fight against Terrorism in the Eu: Lessons Learned from Europol. European View, 15(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-016-0393-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free