Citizens' evaluation of an online argument visualisation platform for eparticipation

4Citations
Citations of this article
217Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Argument visualisation (AV) tools facilitate structured debates utilising elements such as issues, positions and arguments. In this way, AV tools seem promising for improving eParticipation e.g. by avoiding repetition and enhancing clarity in debates. In this paper we present and discuss citizens' opinion on utilising an AV platform for eParticipation, specifically for discussing the emerging topic of environment and climate change. Results have been interesting; most users found the platform and topic interesting and understandable stating that they would use the platform again in the future and recommend it to other people. However, negative feedback has also been received, mostly in relation to things that frustrated users (e.g. the logic behind AV) and suggestions for improvement. As our evaluation is based on a mature AV tool and focuses on general aspects of such tools, we believe that results may be applicable to other AV platforms as well. © 2012 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Panopoulou, E., Dalakiouridou, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2012). Citizens’ evaluation of an online argument visualisation platform for eparticipation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7444 LNCS, pp. 49–60). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33250-0_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free