Evaluation of Time-Limited Trials among Critically Ill Patients with Advanced Medical Illnesses and Reduction of Nonbeneficial ICU Treatments

97Citations
Citations of this article
106Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: For critically ill patients with advanced medical illnesses and poor prognoses, overuse of invasive intensive care unit (ICU) treatments may prolong suffering without benefit. Objective: To examine whether use of time-limited trials (TLTs) as the default care-planning approach for critically ill patients with advanced medical illnesses was associated with decreased duration and intensity of nonbeneficial ICU care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective quality improvement study was conducted from June 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, at the medical ICUs of 3 academic public hospitals in California. Patients at risk for nonbeneficial ICU treatments due to advanced medical illnesses were identified using categories from the Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines for admission and triage. Interventions: Clinicians were trained to use TLTs as the default communication and care-planning approach in meetings with family and surrogate decision makers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quality of family meetings (process measure) and ICU length of stay (clinical outcome measure). Results: A total of 209 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [16.3] years; 127 men [60.8%]; 101 Hispanic patients [48.3%]), with 113 patients (54.1%) in the preintervention period and 96 patients (45.9%) in the postintervention period. Formal family meetings increased from 68 of 113 (60.2%) to 92 of 96 (95.8%) patients between the preintervention and postintervention periods (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, D. W., Neville, T. H., Parrish, J., Ewing, L., Rico, C., Jara, L., … Yee, H. F. (2021). Evaluation of Time-Limited Trials among Critically Ill Patients with Advanced Medical Illnesses and Reduction of Nonbeneficial ICU Treatments. JAMA Internal Medicine, 181(6), 786–794. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1000

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free