Clinical and ethical perspectives on brain death

  • Nair-Collins M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Death determined by neurological criteria, or brain death, is an accepted legal standard for death throughout much of the world. However, brain death has also been a source of controversy ever since its inception, and recently it has been subjected to increased scrutiny, both in academia and in the public domain. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the literature on brain death, with a focus on clinical and ethical perspectives on the topic. To provide context, the history and legal standards, pathophysiology, and clinical diagnostic standards for brain death are reviewed in this paper. Controversies regarding the diagnostic tests and pathophysiology of brain death, the validity of neurological criteria for death, the relationship between brain death and organ transplantation, and several recent legal cases involving brain death in the USA are also reviewed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nair-Collins, M. (2015). Clinical and ethical perspectives on brain death. Medicolegal and Bioethics, 69. https://doi.org/10.2147/mb.s70369

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free