Automating TODO-missed Methods Detection and Patching

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

TODO comments are widely used by developers to remind themselves or others about incomplete tasks. In other words, TODO comments are usually associated with temporary or suboptimal solutions. In practice, all the equivalent suboptimal implementations should be updated (e.g., adding TODOs) simultaneously. However, due to various reasons (e.g., time constraints or carelessness), developers may forget or even are unaware of adding TODO comments to all necessary places, which results in the TODO-missed methods. These "hidden"suboptimal implementations in TODO-missed methods may hurt the software quality and maintainability in the long-term. Therefore, in this article, we propose the novel task of TODO-missed methods detection and patching and develop a novel model, namely TODO-comment Patcher (TDPatcher), to automatically patch TODO comments to the TODO-missed methods in software projects. Our model has two main stages: offline learning and online inference. During the offline learning stage, TDPatcher employs the GraphCodeBERT and contrastive learning for encoding the TODO comment (natural language) and its suboptimal implementation (code fragment) into vector representations. For the online inference stage, we can identify the TODO-missed methods and further determine their patching position by leveraging the offline trained model. We built our dataset by collecting TODO-introduced methods from the top-10,000 Python GitHub repositories and evaluated TDPatcher on them. Extensive experimental results show the promising performance of our model over a set of benchmarks. We further conduct an in-the-wild evaluation that successfully detects 26 TODO-missed methods from 50 GitHub repositories.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gao, Z., Su, Y., Hu, X., & Xia, X. (2024). Automating TODO-missed Methods Detection and Patching. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3700793

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free