How to Engage in Pseudoscience With Real Data: A Criticism of John Hattie’s Arguments in Visible Learning From the Perspective of a Statistician

  • Bergeron P
  • Rivard L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper is a forum contribution that appeared in issue 51-2 in French. Due to the “positive buzz” it garnered following its publication, the MJE editorial team has made its translation available to our English readers. The original version can be accessed here: http://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/9394 . Cet article est paru en français dans l’édition 51-2. En raison de la réception très favorable des lecteurs lors de sa publication, l’équipe éditoriale de la RSÉM permet aux lecteurs anglophones d’en lire une version en anglais. L’article original est disponible à l’adresse suivante : http://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/9394 .

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bergeron, P.-J., & Rivard, L. (2017). How to Engage in Pseudoscience With Real Data: A Criticism of John Hattie’s Arguments in Visible Learning From the Perspective of a Statistician. McGill Journal of Education, 52(1), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.7202/1040816ar

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free