Abstract
With the development of new high-information content fingerprinting techniques for constructing BAC-based physical maps, physical map construction is accelerating and it is important to determine which methodologies work best. In a recent publication (Z. Xu et al., 2004, Genomics 84:941-951), Xu et al. evaluated five different techniques (one agarose-based and four using multiple enzymes) and concluded that a two-enzyme technique was superior. In addition, they found that no benefit was gained from fingerprinting more than 10× coverage. In this paper we report our own extensive simulation results, which lead to contrasting conclusions. Our data indicate that the five-enzyme method known as SNaPshot is the most effective and that the assembly can in fact be significantly improved with greater than 10× coverage. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Nelson, W. M., Dvorak, J., Luo, M. C., Messing, J., Wing, R. A., & Soderlund, C. (2007). Efficacy of clone fingerprinting methodologies. Genomics, 89(1), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.08.008
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.