Efficacy of clone fingerprinting methodologies

20Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

With the development of new high-information content fingerprinting techniques for constructing BAC-based physical maps, physical map construction is accelerating and it is important to determine which methodologies work best. In a recent publication (Z. Xu et al., 2004, Genomics 84:941-951), Xu et al. evaluated five different techniques (one agarose-based and four using multiple enzymes) and concluded that a two-enzyme technique was superior. In addition, they found that no benefit was gained from fingerprinting more than 10× coverage. In this paper we report our own extensive simulation results, which lead to contrasting conclusions. Our data indicate that the five-enzyme method known as SNaPshot is the most effective and that the assembly can in fact be significantly improved with greater than 10× coverage. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nelson, W. M., Dvorak, J., Luo, M. C., Messing, J., Wing, R. A., & Soderlund, C. (2007). Efficacy of clone fingerprinting methodologies. Genomics, 89(1), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.08.008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free