Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: A critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning

225Citations
Citations of this article
498Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper uses frame analysis to examine recent high-profile values statements endorsing ethical design for artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML). Guided by insights from values in design and the sociology of business ethics, we uncover the grounding assumptions and terms of debate that make some conversations about ethical design possible while forestalling alternative visions. Vision statements for ethical AI/ML co-opt the language of some critics, folding them into a limited, technologically deterministic, expert-driven view of what ethical AI/ML means and how it might work.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greene, D., Hoffmann, A. L., & Stark, L. (2019). Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: A critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 2019-January, pp. 2122–2131). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2019.258

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free