Dossier « Le champ des commons en question : perspectives croisées » - A multimethod approach to study the governance of social-ecological systems

  • Janssen M
  • Bousquet F
  • Ostrom E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the lessons learned from a project that combined different types of methods to study the interaction of ecological dynamics, experience of resource users, and institutional arrangements.We combined theoretical computationalmodels, laboratory experimentswith undergraduate students in the USA, field experiments, and role gameswith villagers in rural Thailand and Colombia. The expectation at the start of the project was that specific experience with resource management would affect the way participants play the game and the rules they would develop. We found that contextual variables, such as trust in other community members and the feeling of being an accepted member of the community, and also the ecological context had significant explanatory power, more than experience. Another conclusion fromusing these differentmethods is the fact that the quality of resourcemanagement lies more on the possibility of communication rather than on the types of rules crafted or selected.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Janssen, M. A., Bousquet, F., & Ostrom, E. (2011). Dossier « Le champ des commons en question : perspectives croisées » - A multimethod approach to study the governance of social-ecological systems. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 19(4), 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011135

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free