Enhancing eco-efficiency in hemp-based construction boards: environmental and economic strategies for sustainability

7Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Hemp-based construction materials have increasingly captured attention in recent years as viable alternatives to carbon-intensive materials. A benefit of using hemp (Cannabis sativa L) in construction is its ability to sequester carbon dioxide during plant growth, thereby providing the potential to create carbon-negative materials. However, hemp production can contribute to other environmental impacts such as acidification and eutrophication. Additionally, hemp-based materials usually involve higher costs compared to traditional materials. This study presented an application of an eco-efficiency framework to explore options for improving the environmental and economic performance of non-load-bearing hemp-based construction boards at the production stage in Australia. The study integrated environmental life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis, environmental mitigation strategies, life cycle costing and eco-efficiency portfolio analysis in order to identify eco-efficiency improvement opportunities for non-structural hemp-based construction boards and to compare them with conventional alternatives. The analysis showed that the use of solar electricity during the post-farm stage of hemp-based board production can reduce their environmental impact by 26 per cent and production costs by 0.4 per cent. The proposed framework can assist hemp growers and hemp-based composite manufacturers in Australia in developing cost-effective environmental mitigation strategies to assist sustainability in the construction sector.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rivas Aybar, D. M., John, M., & Biswas, W. (2024). Enhancing eco-efficiency in hemp-based construction boards: environmental and economic strategies for sustainability. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 31(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2024.2377779

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free