Interactions between allelochemicals and the microbial community affect weed suppression following cover crop residue incorporation into soil

46Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and aims: The objective of this study is to understand how soil microorganisms interact with cover crop-derived allelochemicals to suppress weed germination and growth following cover crop residue incorporation. Methods: We conducted a time series experiment crossing sterilized and non-sterilized soil with four different residue treatments. We measured weed seed germination rates, radicle elongation, and disease incidence in seed germination bioassays. We also monitored cover crop-derived, isoflavone allelochemicals in these bioassays. We partitioned the total weed suppression into three sources: microbe-only inhibition, residue-only inhibition, and the microbe-residue interaction. Results: Microbial activity suppressed weed germination and growth for 30 days, while cover crop-derived allelochemicals provided suppression for a limited time. There was an antagonistic interaction between microbes and allelochemicals. This interaction was strongest for water-soluble allelochemicals, while residue fractions containing intact plant tissues retained greater suppressiveness even in the presence of a live microbial community. Conclusions: Microbial activity can directly suppress weed germination and growth, but microorganisms also indirectly help weeds by degrading cover crop-derived allelochemicals. As a result of these interactions, cover crop-derived weed suppression in agricultural soils shifts from an early allelochemical-dominated phase to a later phase where microbial suppression is more important.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lou, Y., Davis, A. S., & Yannarell, A. C. (2016). Interactions between allelochemicals and the microbial community affect weed suppression following cover crop residue incorporation into soil. Plant and Soil, 399(1–2), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2698-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free