Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research

183Citations
Citations of this article
382Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Multinational enterprises are deeply engaged in nonmarket strategy (NMS), including both corporate political activity (CPA) and strategic corporate social responsibility (SCSR). In this review, we document the multinational NMS research according to contributions’ theme, method, context, theory, and level of analysis. We then develop an institutional multiplicity framework to organize our analysis of this large and fragmented body of literature. In so doing, we identify the most impactful contributions within three major themes – multinational CPA, multinational SCSR, and the integration of CPA and SCSR – and their respective subthemes, and call attention to limitations in the extant research. We also highlight promising avenues for future research, including expanding the scope of NMS to incorporate microfoundations research, integrating macrolevel scholarship on global institutions, placing greater attention on the interaction between CPA and SCSR, and incorporating multi-actor global issues and movements. Our review underscores the growing importance and missed opportunities of NMS research in the international business field.

References Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, P., Doh, J. P., Rajwani, T., & Siegel, D. (2021, December 1). Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research. Journal of International Business Studies. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00438-x

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2504080120160

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 101

59%

Professor / Associate Prof. 28

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 24

14%

Researcher 18

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 115

71%

Social Sciences 19

12%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19

12%

Medicine and Dentistry 9

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 5
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 157

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0