Can CT radiomic analysis in NSCLC predict histology and EGFR mutation status?

79Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To assess the role of radiomic features in distinguishing squamous and adenocarcinoma subtypes of nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and predict EGFR mutations. Institution Review Board-approved study included chest CT scans of 93 consecutive patients (43 men, 50 women, mean age 60 ± 11 years) with biopsy-proven squamous and adenocarcinoma lung cancers greater than 1 cm. All cancers were evaluated for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. The clinical parameters such as age, sex, and smoking history and standard morphology-based CT imaging features such as target lesion longest diameter (LD), longest perpendicular diameter (LPD), density, and presence of cavity were recorded. The radiomics data was obtained using commercial CT texture analysis (CTTA) software. The CTTA was performed on a single image of the dominant lung lesion. The predictive value of clinical history, standard imaging features, and radiomics was assessed with multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. Between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas, ROC analysis showed significant difference in 3/11 radiomic features (entropy, normalized SD, total) [AUC 0.686–0.744, P = .006 to < .0001) than clinical (AUC 0.676, P = .017) and standard imaging (AUC 0.708, P < .0001]. The combined probability variable for radiomics, clinical and imaging features was higher (AUC 0.890, P < .0001) than independent probability variables. The radiomics evaluation adds incremental value to clinical history and standard imaging features in predicting histology and EGFR mutations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Digumarthy, S. R., Padole, A. M., Lo Gullo, R., Sequist, L. V., & Kalra, M. K. (2019). Can CT radiomic analysis in NSCLC predict histology and EGFR mutation status? Medicine (United States), 98(1), E13963. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013963

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free