Abstract
According to the trivialist, everything is true. But why would anyone believe that? It turns out that trivialism emerges naturally from a certain inconsistency view of language, and it has significant benefits that need to be acknowledged. But trivialism also encounters some troubles along the way. After discussing them, I sketch a couple of alternatives that can preserve the benefits of trivialism without the corresponding costs.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Bueno, O. (2007). Troubles with trivialism. Inquiry, 50(6), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740701698670
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free