Can flexicurity make ethical sense? The 'terceisation function' as a moral lever for inter-organisational employment schemes

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An employers' alliance (EA) is a group of employers who team up to hire and share workers. It is presented as 'flexicurity in action', in other words, as a tool allowing employers and workers to find new win-win compromises at the company level. Even when motivated by the best of intentions and with all pre-conditions fulfilled, implementing such a new inter-organisational employment scheme might end in failure. We will describe such a failure with the help of a case study showing how employers considered the EA scheme as a possible solution for the informal multi-activity of their staff. We then explore some of the reasons for the failure in implementation and describe how a supporting third party function, which we call the terceisation function, could help the process to succeed and the EA to evolve towards a more equitable and sustainable flexicurity scheme. Copyright © 2012 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xhauflair, V., & Pichault, F. (2012). Can flexicurity make ethical sense? The “terceisation function” as a moral lever for inter-organisational employment schemes. International Journal of Work Innovation, 1(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWI.2012.047985

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free