Ethics and the ontology of freedom: Problematization and responsiveness in foucault and deleuze

13Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Both Foucault and Deleuze define ethics as a form of creative activity. Yet, given certain ontological features indicated by both thinkers, ethics must be more than just creative and critical activity. Forgoing a transcendent ground for ethics, the ontological condition of ethics - what Foucault calls liberté and Deleuze calls the plane of immanence - is an opening for change that makes possible normalizing modes of existence as well transformative ones. In this context, ethics must be a practice that comprehends the dangers of such open-ended creation. The concept of problematization, emphasized by Foucault and Deleuze, leads to an enhanced understanding of their conception of ethics. On this understanding, ethics is a practice of problematization requiring a determination and assessment of the most pressing problems to which one must respond rather than attempt to solve once and for all. Ethics is necessarily a responsive engagement with the problems of one's present. © Erinn Cunniff Gilson 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilson, E. C. (2014). Ethics and the ontology of freedom: Problematization and responsiveness in foucault and deleuze. Foucault Studies, (17), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i17.4254

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free