Safety of hypercapnic challenge: Cardiovascular and neurologic considerations

13Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The hemodynamic, cerebrovascular, and neurologic effects of hypercapnia with 4% and 6% CO2 were retrospectively reviewed in 217 patients referred for regional CBF (rCBF) procedures. Inhalation of CO2 significantly increased rCBF, blood pressure, and pulse from baseline. The findings suggest a higher incidence of side effects with 6% CO2 concentration and an equivalent vasoreactivity to 4%. We recommend the use of 4% CO2 for hypercapnic stimulation, and present safety guidelines for its use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gitelman, D. R., Prohovnik, I., & Tatemichi, T. K. (1991). Safety of hypercapnic challenge: Cardiovascular and neurologic considerations. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 11(6), 1036–1040. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.1991.172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free