Gathering validity evidence for a 3D-printed simulator for training of myringotomy and ventilation tube insertion

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to gather validity evidence according to Messick's framework for a novel 3D-printed simulator for myringotomy with ventilation tube insertion for use in technical skills training of otorhinolaryngology (ORL) residents. Methods: The study included 15 junior ORL residents (trainees) and 13 experienced teaching otolaryngologists (experts). Experts and trainees first received an identically structured introduction to the procedure, simulator, and simulation setup. Five procedures performed by each participant were video-recorded and ordered randomly for blinded rating by two independent raters. The rating tools used were a global rating scale (GBRS) and a task-specific checklist. Validity evidence was collected according to Messick's framework. Differences in time consumption and performance scores were analyzed. Finally, a pass/fail standard was established using the contrasting groups' method. Results: Trainees used significantly more time per procedure (109 s, 95% CI: 99–120) than experts (82 s, 95% CI: 71–93; p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lüscher, M., Konge, L., Tingsgaard, P., Barrett, T. Q., & Andersen, S. A. W. (2023). Gathering validity evidence for a 3D-printed simulator for training of myringotomy and ventilation tube insertion. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology, 8(5), 1357–1364. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1123

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free