Obstetrics and gynecology physician knowledge of Rh immune globulin prophylaxis

3Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that more than 20% of laboratories would have recommended inaccurate doses of Rh immune globulin (RhIG) in hypothetical cases. Efforts have been made in educating laboratories in correct dosing calculations; however, obstetricians are most often responsible for ordering RhIG. The objective of this study was to assess knowledge of RhIG indications and dosing among obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) physicians in the United States. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anonymous 17- question online survey was distributed to all OB/GYN resident and attending physicians affiliated with US residency training programs. RESULTS: A total of 165 surveys were collected, with 139 fully completed. Ninety-two percent of respondents correctly recognized the need for RhIG in D– patients with negative antibody screens. In a scenario of a fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) of 45 mL, only 22% of respondents correctly chose the appropriate RhIG dosage. Of those who were correct, 10% had correctly identified 30 mL as the amount of fetal whole blood covered by one dose of RhIG, while 48% incorrectly identified 15 mL (n = 31). A total of 49.3% of respondents reported residency as the most recent formal training on RhIG dosing and 35% reported never (n = 140). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that OB/GYN physicians are knowledgeable regarding indications for RhIG immunoprophylaxis but were insufficient at calculating dosages in cases of FMH. More standardized education and training among OB/GYN physicians may decrease the risk of maternal alloimmunization, in part because RhIG dosage recommendations from laboratories are not standard practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, A., Morris, E., Adams, R., & Fung, M. K. (2017). Obstetrics and gynecology physician knowledge of Rh immune globulin prophylaxis. Transfusion, 57(6), 1385–1390. https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.14125

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free