Assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia: Role contradictions for physicians

16Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is widely assumed by the general public that if assisted suicide (AS) or euthanasia (VE) were legalised doctors must be essentially involved in the whole process including prescribing the medication and (in euthanasia) administering it. This paper explores some reasons for this assumption and argues that it flatly contradicts what it means to be a doctor. The paper is thus not mainly concerned with the ethics of AS/VE but rather with the concept of a doctor that has evolved since the time of Hippocrates to current professional guidance reflected in healthcare law. The paper argues that the most common recent argument for AS/VE - that patients have a right to control when and how they die - in fact points to the involvement not of doctors but of legal agencies as decision makers plus technicians as agents. © Royal College of Physicians, 2010. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Randall, F., & Downie, R. (2010). Assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia: Role contradictions for physicians. Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London. Royal College of Physicians. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.10-4-323

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free