Endocrine disruption and the USFDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Drugs may have intended or unintended endocrine effects. Drug evaluation may include both in vitro and in vivo evaluations of toxicity and developmental/reproductive effects. After a signal is identified, human relevance is of utmost concern. An integration "tool" that formalizes a weight-of-evidence approach has been developed to assess concern about reproductive/developmental toxicity to humans. This approach can be used to assess concern about an endocrine disruption signal. A signal alone does not mean a concern for humans. An effect needs to have biologic relevance, and exposure thresholds for effects may exist. Risk/benefit for a particular drug is a clinical decision and may vary by the drug indication. Risk management for an identified concern could include wording in patient communications, tracking distribution or limited distribution, and patient or pregnancy registries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jacobs, A., Brown, P., Farrelly, J., Fisher, J. E., & Morse, D. (2003). Endocrine disruption and the USFDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. In Pure and Applied Chemistry (Vol. 75, pp. 2605–2607). Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375112605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free