Abstract
Starting with a critique of current beliefs that maxillary canine reduction in hominids was causally related to tool‐use and tool‐making, the article suggests that reduction took place because selection favored a different pattern of social behavior. Sexual dimorphism and aggressive intragroup behavior tend to be related in terrestrial primates. A shift in hormonal interactions is suggested, such that selection for diminution of aggressiveness resulted in a diminution of sexual dimorphism. Tool‐making is seen as one of a number of cognitive reorganizations, not as a causal factor in canine reduction.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Holloway, R. L. (1967). Tools and Teeth: Some Speculations Regarding Canine Reduction 1. American Anthropologist, 69(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1967.69.1.02a00070
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.