Hosea's marriage reconsidered

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Whilst there is general agreement that Hosea 1-3 contains prophetic sign-acts, biographical information is sparse, and some argue that it is unwise to try to reconstruct details of Hosea's marriage(s). This article argues from the premise that the historical context of sign-acts, insofar as it may be discerned, is significant for interpretation, and seeks to reexamine proposed historical scenarios and present a partial reconstruction. Issues include the interpretation of (' eshet zenunim), translated 'wife of whoredom', in 1:2, and the identity of the unnamed woman in 3:1. The article concludes that 'eshet zenunim is best understood, proleptically, to relate to Gomer's adultery after her marriage to Hosea, and that 3:1-5 points to the restoration of their earlier relationship. This view best fits the text and the parallel with Israel's spiritual adultery, forgiveness, and restoration by her divine husband.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Routledge, R. (2018). Hosea’s marriage reconsidered. Tyndale Bulletin. Tyndale House. https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.27646

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free