Quality of life in children and adolescents with spinal muscular atrophy

11Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Quality of life (QoL) is a key aspect in the treatment of patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). International information regarding QoL in SMA is scarce, and is not available in our country. Objective: To characterize QoL in a sample of Chilean children and adolescents with SMA. Subjects and Method: Observational, cross-sectional study. A general questionnaire and the PedsQL™ 3.0 Neuromuscular Module Inventory were applied to parents of children with SMA aged 2 to 18 years. It has three areas: Disease, Communication, and Family. A score > 60 was considered as good QoL, 30-60 as regular, and < 30 as low. MINITAB-17® software was used, considering significant a p < 0.05 value. Results: We recruited 38 patients, with median age 8 years (2-18), 52.63% were male, and 17 (44.7%) with SMA I. All had genetic confirmation. The total score of QoL was 51.92 ± 17, representing 31% good, 55% regular, and 14% low. Regarding SMA I, it was 46.5 ± 15.2 and SMA II-III, 56.3 ± 17.4 (p = 0.071). Concerning the area of Disease, it was 53.83 ± 18.1, Family 48.6 ± 23.14, and Communication 33.3 (IQR: 0.0; 83.33). In this last area, children with SMA II-III, older than 6 years., with non-invasive ventilatory support, or living out of the metropolitan area had higher scores, however, in multivariate analysis, only SMA type was significant, which explained 40,9% of the variation in the communication area score. Conclusions: In this sample of SMA pediatric patients, the QoL was regular or good in most of them. The lowest area was communication, with a higher score in those children with higher motor function.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vega, P., Glisser, C., Castiglioni, C., Virginia Amézquita, M., Quirola, M., & Barja, S. (2020). Quality of life in children and adolescents with spinal muscular atrophy. Revista Chilena de Pediatria, 91(4), 512–520. https://doi.org/10.32641/rchped.v91i4.1443

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free