Functional Outcome in Spinal Meningioma Surgery and Use of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring

17Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Data on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) during spinal meningioma (SM) surgery are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the role of IOM and its impact on post-operative functional outcome. Eighty-six consecutive surgically treated SM patients were included. We assessed pre and post-operative Modified McCormick Scale (mMCS), radiological and histopathological data and IOM findings. Degree of cord compression was associated with preoperative mMCS and existence of motor or sensory deficits (p < 0.001). IOM was used in 51 (59.3%) patients (IOM-group). Median pre and post-operative mMCS was II and I, respectively (p < 0.001). Fifty-seven (66.3%) patients showed an improvement of at least one grade in the mMCS one year after surgery. In the IOM group, only one patient had worsened neurological status, and this was correctly predicted by alterations in evoked potentials. Analysis of both groups found no significantly better neurological outcome in the IOM group, but IOM led to changes in surgical strategy in complex cases. Resection of SM is safe and leads to improved neurological outcome in most cases. Both complication and tumor recurrence rates were low. We recommend the use of IOM in surgically challenging cases, such as completely ossified or large ventrolateral SM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jesse, C. M., Alvarez Abut, P., Wermelinger, J., Raabe, A., Schär, R. T., & Seidel, K. (2022). Functional Outcome in Spinal Meningioma Surgery and Use of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring. Cancers, 14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14163989

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free