Fundamental Flaws with the Fundamental Niche

25Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

For more than 70 years, Hutchinson's concept of the fundamental niche has guided ecological research. Hutchinson envisioned the niche as a multidimensional hypervolume relating the fitness of an organism to relevant environmental factors. Here, we challenge the utility of the concept to modern ecologists, based on its inability to account for environmental variation and phenotypic plasticity. We have ample evidence that the frequency, duration, and sequence of abiotic stress influence the survivorship and performance of organisms. Recent work shows that organisms also respond to the spatial configuration of abiotic conditions. Spatiotemporal variation of the environment interacts with the genotype to generate a unique phenotype at each life stage. These dynamics cannot be captured adequately by a multidimensional hypervolume. Therefore, we recommend that ecologists abandon the niche as a tool for predicting the persistence of species and embrace mechanistic models of population growth that incorporate spatiotemporal dynamics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Angilletta, M. J., Sears, M. W., Levy, O., Youngblood, J. P., & Vandenbrooks, J. M. (2019). Fundamental Flaws with the Fundamental Niche. In Integrative and Comparative Biology (Vol. 59, pp. 1038–1048). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icz084

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free