How categorization impacts the design of requests: Asking for email addresses in call-centre interactions

15Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Marketing research shows that organizations tailor communication for particular customer 'segments', but little is known about the live design of interaction for different categories. To investigate this, we examine telephone calls to a holiday sales call-centre (for 'seniors') and a university admissions call-centre (for 'young' students). While topically different, call-takers in both datasets requested callers' email addresses in order to progress service. Using conversation analysis, we examine how these requests were designed, where and how 'age' was made relevant, and how subsequent service provision was handled in a way that matched callers' presumed age categories. Contrastive to the static notion of 'segments', we show how recipient design is bound up with categorial considerations while being responsive to the live unfolding of actual interaction. The article demonstrates how a comparative collection-based approach can be used to analyse the relevance of social categories in situations where this is implicit or ambiguous. (Membership categorization, customer segmentation, conversation analysis, recipient design, requests, age).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flinkfeldt, M., Parslow, S., & Stokoe, E. (2022). How categorization impacts the design of requests: Asking for email addresses in call-centre interactions. Language in Society, 51(4), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404521000592

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free