The 2011 Occupy Movements: Rancière and the Crisis of Democracy

64Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Occupy movements in 2011 – this essay focuses mainly on Spain and the United States – have been more than moments of grassroots or direct democracy: they have been collective political practices testing forms of non-representationist democracy in the Europe of representative democracy to an unusually great extent. The precarious subjects of post-Fordism rejected political representation, and at the same time they struggled for a ‘real’ democracy. This oxymoron between representation and democracy structures the political philosophy of Jacques Rancière and corresponds with his well-known distinction between police and politics. This is one of the reasons why his thinking is helpful to understand them as decidedly political ones. However, the assembly as one of the central topoi of theories of democracy plays no prominent role in Rancière's political philosophy. In contrast to this, I focus on the central practice of the assemblies in the Occupy movements and develop a concept of presentist democracy. © 2014, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lorey, I. (2014). The 2011 Occupy Movements: Rancière and the Crisis of Democracy. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(8), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414550835

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free